Source ::
Djamena/Paris - Another criminal case of child-trafficking and child-import coming from Africa surfaced in
103 children coming in from Darfur and Chad, who would not be all orphans, were retained at the last minute by the Chadian authorities when they were about to be embarked and delivered to French couples in request and need of a child. The scale of these operations became industrial and is milking the markets for hundreds of children.
These practises have multiplied during the past couple of years, gradually erasing the “Rights of the child" as expressed in the International Convention of the Rights of the Child were erased and successfully replacing it by an alleged “Right to children" for Westerners. Anything goes with certain sterile couples in their quest for obtaining a child from the Third World at all costs and without any ethics, since very few children are put up for adoption in the developed countries. And
Some time ago, an association had made adopt small Malians in
A few years ago, a network of about fifty Brazilian lawyers was dismantled which had been active in the business of delivering and trafficking children towards
There is little, the Chinese authorities don't allow at the visits to orphanages made by Western couples coming to choose the most beautiful child and the child in better health, like if one shops and chooses in the rays of toys at Toys4us or Harrods with Christmas.
Of course, each time high “expenses”, several thousands of euro's, supposedly for administrative and logistical costs and expenses, have to be paid by the future adoptive parents. One would often ask them to also pay considerable sums in cash “to cover for the inevitable costs of corruption”.
By paying up the right price for it, the scandal singer Madonna even bought her a little child of which the father was still alive.
Operation “Darfur” was about paying nearly half-a-million euro's to a local association which had arisen in
Whereas slavery has ceased and decolonization was completed, the plundering of the resources of underdeveloped countries are exerted from now on on their children. Traffic of ivory is prohibited but a new ebony traffic is emerging without the authorities of the “receiving” countries intervening or even morally condemning these practises. In
Instead of helping local families to accommodate and instead of nourishing the small refugees in their own cultural environment of origin, a spirit really humanitarian, some people rather spend twenty to a hundred times as much not to help hundreds of children, but only to get their hands on one child and make it their exclusive possession.
The “demand for a child”, “the right to have a child " has turned into complete hysteria in the adoptive networks.
This “merchandising” of children developed gradually with the legal degradation of principles of kinship of a child being originally based on genetics and the existence of authentic biological parents towards an “ideology of emotions and affections", a very slippery and dubious principle to base kinship on. It is thus by the eagerness put in by certain adoption associations and agencies to defend nozzle and nails of the childbirth under X, which deprives in an irreversible way one child of its origins (and inevitably of his/her father) while at the same time that violates the provisions of the International Convention of the Rights of the Child ratified by France. But the upkeeping of childbirth under X thus puts on the French market several hundreds of adoption children each year.
Contempt of the bonds of the child with both is parents, as in the divorce where a child is in practice, like personal property, still generally allotted and handed over to only one of the parents, also contributed to the development of a harmful principle according to which genetic bonds, however most authentic and important to the affective development of the child, do not count while only the “supposedly emotional accomplished fact” counts.
Contempt for the real interests of children is also obvious in the oneparent-adoptions which are still authorized in
Legislative DNA-ballet around immigrant fathers in
Source :: France - SOS Papa – Translation from French by Peter Tromp, Fatherknowledgecentre Europe - October 2007
While the mother with regard to kinship is certain of her legal status as a parent simply by giving birth to a child, the father remains in limbo without DNA-analysis, just like in the 19th century.
Advances in genetic DNA technology and knowledge, during the last half-century, have allowed to close this gap but, curiously, in
DNA-testing is free in
General outcry of the feminist ideologists against DNA-analysis - which would make it possible to check the claims of kinship relations by related immigrants objectively - confirms this reactionary “philosophy” of childhood and kinship in our country (France): where only a mother decides and defines who is the father of ‘her’ child, the child is legally defined as only one more of the body-extensions of the mother and the father is simply legally reduced to a reproduction-accessory to which one is legally permitted to lie by free choice.
To be opposed to DNA-testing and –analyses, thus also leaves the door wide open for the further development of child-trafficking and affiliation-fraud in claiming various state allowances and benefits as well as tax-reductions for children, on the basis of forged identity papers of childhood and kinship.
No comments:
Post a Comment